Pro: Node-based UI, intuitive, and robust, Bonemap said: Using Loopback allows a very direct and therefore quick workflow for setting up audio on the Mac operating system. Notes: Node-based but not as good as Loopback in terms of UI from my brief test this morning.Ĭost: $100 (Free demo version but degrades audio after a short period of time) Pro: Virtual audio devices and source mixing Info on how to set up a multi-output device (also applicable to Sound Flower)Ĭon: (No output routing/you need to make a multi-output device to do output routing?)Ĭon: Mac-only ( Windows is in development and you can sign up to be notified)įeatures: Automatically pause your music, set individual apps' volumes, and record system It is not possible like in Dante, Sound Siphon and Loopback to choose several destinations but if you choose Background Music as entry in a software you get the mix chosen in the Pulldown menu of Background Music and on the hardware output you want. Info Video (also applicable to Sound Flower) I did some brief testing with Loopback and Sound Siphon this morning (and if I did more audio work than I do I'd choose Loopback over Sound Siphon even though it's twice as expensive).Ĭon: You need to make a multi-output device to do output routing I've personally used SoundFlower and iShowU Audio Capture for projects. I can update this if anyone has anything to add. I compiled what everyone listed and added my own contributions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |